FROM GOA JOURNO..

Hi,
this is a mailer from the King Solomon of Goan Journalism...
If Frederic Noronha has taken names to cite trends, then
there must be something to this. For this bugger rarely
takes names unless he has the story by its balls.


CONCLUSION
If...
Herald is pro-Churchill/pro-Congress/pro-plagiarists/anti-BJP
Goan Observer is pro-Congress/anti-Churchill/anti-BJP
/pro-Luizinho
Goa Doot is pro-BJP/anti-Congress/
Goa 365 is pro-BJP
Waman Prabhu is pro-BJP
The Gomantak supports even a totem pole propped by Pawar
And If the Navhind Times continues to support paedophiles
and sleep with every potential winning horse

THEN SURELY WE COULDN'T ASK FOR A MORE
HONEST MEDIA SETUP. LOOK AT IT THIS WAY.
EVERY LIE SLUNG BY THE BJP IN GOA DOOT
CAN BE EFFECTIVELY NEUTRALISED BY AN
EQUALLY POTENT FIB PRINTED IN THE
HERALD PLANTED BY CHURCHILL.
HEY THINGS ARE LOOKING BETTER AREN'T THEY!!!:)

PEN PRICKS


-----------------------------------
SOURCED FROM GOAJOURNO....
------------------------------------------------------------------

It's election time in Goa. It seems to me that this time,
with the spurt in the number of new cable-news
operations, and newspapers,  various sections of the
media are willing to take a much more blatantly partisan
stand towards various politicians and parties.

What do the others feel? One could perceive Goa
Doot's clear pro-BJP slant; the Goa Observer's anti-
Churchill, anti-BJP (and pro-Congress colours), Herald's
pro-Churchill, pro-Congress line; Goa 365 (and particularly
Julio Da Silva's) pro-BJP, pro-Churchill and anti-Congress
tirades; and some other cable TV's operators (Waman
Prabhu's for instance) BJP-supportive and Parrikar
-backing tendency.

From what I could recall, in no election so far has the media
been so partisan. If this is the case, what are the factors
involved? Just the increase in competitive pressures?
Attempts at re-shaping the media
within Goa?

Would the others agree? FN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------